|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:13:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com> To: Anne & Lynn Wheeler <lynn@garlic.com> Cc: Aram Perez <aramperez@mac.com>, "cryptography@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com> In-Reply-To: <42D69C41.1000506@garlic.com> > If you had two products ... both effectively performing the same > function, one you already had deployed, which was significantly cheaper, > significantly simpler, and significantly faster, which one would you choose? I was told that one of the reasons SSL took off was because Visa and/or MC told merchants they would "for the time being" treat SSL as card-present, in terms of fraud penalties, etc. If this is true (anyone here verify? My source is on the list if s/he wants to name themselves), then SSL/SET is an interesting example of betting on both sides. /r$ -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |