![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 11:33:47 -0500 From: Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov> In-reply-to: <4296144C.7020302@nma.com> To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Cc: Ed Gerck <edgerck@nma.com> On May 26, 2005, at 13:24, Ed Gerck wrote: > A better solution, along the same lines, would have been for Citibank > to > ask from their account holders when they login for Internet banking, > whether they would like to set up a three- or four-character > combination > to be used in all emails from the bank to the account holder. Why couldn't they just use digitally signed S/MIME email? I'm sure that works just as well as signed SSL handshakes. Oh. Answered my own question, didn't I? --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |