[17091] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: $90 for high assurance _versus_ $349 for low assurance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ng Pheng Siong)
Sun Mar 20 12:04:28 2005
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:36:33 +0800
From: Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com>
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <20050315160459.GE28824@piias899.ms.com>
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 11:04:59AM -0500, Victor Duchovni wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:23:49AM +1300, Peter Gutmann wrote:
> > Certainly with UIXC it's not worth anything.
>
> What is UIXC?
lemme guess: universal & indiscriminate cross certification
oh wait, peter did define it: "implicit" not "indiscriminate"
--
Ng Pheng Siong <ngps@netmemetic.com>
http://sandbox.rulemaker.net/ngps -+- M2Crypto, ZServerSSL for Zope, Blog
http://www.sqlcrypt.com -+- Database Engine with Transparent AES Encryption
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
