[16390] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [off-topic, but not by ukcrypto standards] ukcrypto-moderated
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ben Laurie)
Mon Nov 1 15:53:41 2004
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2004 22:22:45 +0100
From: Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>
To: ukcrypto@chiark.greenend.org.uk
Cc: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <BDA9B9C1.70B9A%zenadsl6186@zen.co.uk>
Peter Fairbrother wrote:
> Ben Laurie wrote:
>
>
>>OK, since my previous attempt to create a lower volume
>>ukcrypto-like-thing failed, I have concluded that the only way to handle
>>the problem is to produce a moderated version of ukcrypto. I know for
>>sure there's demand for this, but I also know that the volume is too
>>high for traditional moderation methods (at least too high for _me_ to
>>use traditional moderation).
>
>
> I have a question. What do you think is on topic?
>
>
> The original charter, as I understand it, was to discuss UK legislation
> relating to cryptography - which is fine, but very little is happening in
> that area right now, and there would be virtually no posts.
I would include privacy and anonymity as well as cryptography. I'm open
to persuasion for other topics.
Killing time isn't one of them.
--
ApacheCon! 13-17 November! http://www.apachecon.com/
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/
"There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he
doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
