[16214] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Time for new hash standard
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Russell Nelson)
Mon Sep 20 15:08:28 2004
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:23:46 -0400
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <p06110460bd73d189d8a2@[66.149.49.5]>
> Luckily, there are alternatives. The National Institute of Standards and
> Technology already has standards for longer - and harder to break - hash
> functions: SHA-224, SHA-256, SHA-384, and SHA-512. They're already
> government standards, and can already be used. This is a good stopgap, but
> I'd like to see more.
http://cr.yp.to/antiforgery.html#hash127
--
--My blog is at angry-economist.russnelson.com | Violence never solves
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | problems, it just changes
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 212-202-2318 voice | them into more subtle
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213 | FWD# 404529 via VOIP | problems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
