[16170] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [anonsec] Re: potential new IETF WG on anonymous IPSec (fwd from
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ian Grigg)
Wed Sep 15 22:30:37 2004
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 00:41:41 +0100
From: Ian Grigg <iang@systemics.com>
To: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz>
Cc: smb@research.att.com, cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <E1C6uKH-0008Ou-00@medusa01>
Peter Gutmann wrote:
> "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> writes:
>>>Maybe it's worth doing some sort of generic RFC for this security model to
>>>avoid scattering the same thing over a pile of IETF WGs,
>>
>>Sounds good. Who wants to write it...?
>
> Since there seems to be at least some interest in this, I'll make a start on
> it. If anyone else wants to add their $0.03 to it [0], let me know.
It occurs to me that a number of these ideas could
be written up over time ... a wiki, anyone? I think
it is high past time to start documenting crypto
patterns.
FWIW, on opportunistic cryptography (a la "SSH model")
I wrote up a opportunistic draft paper here:
http://iang.org/papers/spock.html
(FTR, I've received substantial comments from TwanVDS
and DigbytT.)
iang
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
