[16151] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: [anonsec] Re: potential new IETF WG on anonymous IPSec (fwd from hal@finney.org) (fwd from touch@ISI.EDU)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Peter Gutmann)
Mon Sep 13 13:38:43 2004
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz (Peter Gutmann)
To: pgut001@cs.auckland.ac.nz, smb@research.att.com
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <20040912132515.6C7251AE7E@berkshire.research.att.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 05:09:13 +1200
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com> writes:
>>Maybe it's worth doing some sort of generic RFC for this security model to
>>avoid scattering the same thing over a pile of IETF WGs,
>
>Sounds good. Who wants to write it...?
Since there seems to be at least some interest in this, I'll make a start on
it. If anyone else wants to add their $0.03 to it [0], let me know.
Peter.
[0] Or $0.04 if you're paying in Euros.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
