[16137] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Perplexing proof

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Victor Duchovni)
Sat Sep 11 12:51:34 2004

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:40:08 -0400
From: Victor Duchovni <Victor.Duchovni@MorganStanley.com>
To: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah@shipwright.com>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Mail-Followup-To: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah@shipwright.com>,
	cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <p0611045fbd674a95097e@[66.149.49.5]>

On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 08:23:06AM -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:

> "[The suggested proof] is rather incomprehensible," professor Marcus du
> Sautoy of Oxford University told The Guardian, adding that if correct it
> could lead to the creation of a "prime spectrometer" that would bring "the
> whole of e-commerce to its knees overnight".

http://www.maths.ox.ac.uk/~dusautoy/flash/1hard/listpub.htm

So at least now we have a named source, even one who works on generalized
zeta functions. The out of the blue "prime spectrometer" claim is still
rather puzzling... Does anyone know why Du Sautoy is making this claim
(if it is indeed reported correctly).

-- 

 /"\ ASCII RIBBON                  NOTICE: If received in error,
 \ / CAMPAIGN     Victor Duchovni  please destroy and notify
  X AGAINST       IT Security,     sender. Sender does not waive
 / \ HTML MAIL    Morgan Stanley   confidentiality or privilege,
                                   and use is prohibited.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post