|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 18:10:57 +1000 From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au> To: Hal Finney <hal@finney.org> Cc: jerrold.leichter@smarts.com, cryptography@metzdowd.com In-Reply-To: <20040824162101.8AB3257E2A@finney.org> --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline My immediate (and not yet further considered) reaction to the description of Joux' method was that it might be defeated by something as simple as adding a block counter to the input each time. I any case, I see it as a form of dictionary attack, and wonder whether the same kinds of techniques wouldn't help. -- Dan. --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (NetBSD) iD8DBQFBLEmREAVxvV4N66cRApuJAKDSNSR4YbKXJm8+F8pFO6iHAmQ/PgCg4lOU SbOqUfk8ISH/LSUiJAg2fPk= =rSoz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u65IjBhB3TIa72Vp-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |