![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 19:22:56 +0100 From: Dave Howe <DaveHowe@gmx.co.uk> To: Email@metzdowd.com, List@metzdowd.com:Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com> In-Reply-To: <07c101c45ee3$5bad7ce0$6501a8c0@JOSEPHAS> Joseph Ashwood wrote: > I am continually asked about spam, and I personally treat phishing as a > subset of it, but I have seen virtually no interest in correcting the > problem. I have personally been told I don't even know how many times that > phishing "is not an issue." Well if nothing else, it is impossible for my bank to send me anything I would believe via email now.... To take this even slightly more on-topic - does anyone here have a bank capable of authenticating themselves to you when they ring you? I have had four phone calls from my bank this year, all of which start out by asking me to identify myself to them. When I point out that they must know who I am - as they just phoned me - and that I have no way of knowing who they are, they are completely lost (probably takes them away from the little paper script pinned to their desk) --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |