[15536] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Chalabi Reportedly Told Iran That U.S. Had Code
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (R. A. Hettinga)
Wed Jun 2 12:34:57 2004
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 12:06:59 -0400
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com, cypherpunks@al-qaeda.net
From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah@shipwright.com>
<http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/02/politics/02CHAL.html?th=&pagewanted=print&position=>
The New York Times
June 2, 2004
Chalabi Reportedly Told Iran That U.S. Had Code
By JAMES RISEN and DAVID JOHNSTON
ASHINGTON, June 1 - Ahmad Chalabi, the Iraqi leader and former ally of the
Bush administration, disclosed to an Iranian official that the United
States had broken the secret communications code of Iran's intelligence
service, betraying one of Washington's most valuable sources of information
about Iran, according to United States intelligence officials.
The general charge that Mr. Chalabi provided Iran with critical American
intelligence secrets was widely reported last month after the Bush
administration cut off financial aid to Mr. Chalabi's organization, the
Iraqi National Congress, and American and Iraqi security forces raided his
Baghdad headquarters.
The Bush administration, citing national security concerns, asked The New
York Times and other news organizations not to publish details of the case.
The Times agreed to hold off publication of some specific information that
top intelligence officials said would compromise a vital, continuing
intelligence operation. The administration withdrew its request on Tuesday,
saying information about the code-breaking was starting to appear in news
accounts.
Mr. Chalabi and his aides have said he knew of no secret information
related to Iran and therefore could not have communicated any intelligence
to Tehran.
American officials said that about six weeks ago, Mr. Chalabi told the
Baghdad station chief of Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security that
the United States was reading the communications traffic of the Iranian spy
service, one of the most sophisticated in the Middle East.
According to American officials, the Iranian official in Baghdad, possibly
not believing Mr. Chalabi's account, sent a cable to Tehran detailing his
conversation with Mr. Chalabi, using the broken code. That encrypted cable,
intercepted and read by the United States, tipped off American officials to
the fact that Mr. Chalabi had betrayed the code-breaking operation, the
American officials said.
American officials reported that in the cable to Tehran, the Iranian
official recounted how Mr. Chalabi had said that one of "them" - a
reference to an American - had revealed the code-breaking operation, the
officials said. The Iranian reported that Mr. Chalabi said the American was
drunk.
The Iranians sent what American intelligence regarded as a test message,
which mentioned a cache of weapons inside Iraq, believing that if the code
had been broken, United States military forces would be quickly dispatched
to the specified site. But there was no such action.
The account of Mr. Chalabi's actions has been confirmed by several senior
American officials, who said the leak contributed to the White House
decision to break with him.
It could not be learned exactly how the United States broke the code. But
intelligence sources said that in the past, the United States has broken
into the embassies of foreign governments, including those of Iran, to
steal information, including codes.
The F.B.I. has opened an espionage investigation seeking to determine
exactly what information Mr. Chalabi turned over to the Iranians as well as
who told Mr. Chalabi that the Iranian code had been broken, government
officials said. The inquiry, still in an early phase, is focused on a very
small number of people who were close to Mr. Chalabi and also had access to
the highly restricted information about the Iran code.
Some of the people the F.B.I. expects to interview are civilians at the
Pentagon who were among Mr. Chalabi's strongest supporters and served as
his main point of contact with the government, the officials said. So far,
no one has been accused of any wrongdoing.
In a television interview on May 23, Mr. Chalabi said on CNN's "Late
Edition" that he met in Tehran in December with the Iranian supreme leader,
Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and the Iranian president, Mohammad Khatami. He
also said he had met with Iran's minister of information.
Mr. Chalabi attacked the C.I.A. and the director of central intelligence,
George J. Tenet, saying the agency was behind what Mr. Chalabi asserted was
an effort to smear him.
"I have never passed any classified information to Iran or have done
anything - participated in any scheme of intelligence against the United
States," Mr. Chalabi said on "Fox News Sunday." "This charge is false. I
have never seen a U.S. classified document, and I have never seen - had a
U.S. classified briefing."
Mr. Chalabi, a member of the Iraqi Governing Council, said, "We meet
people from the Iranian Embassy in Baghdad regularly," but said that was to
be expected of Iraqi officials like himself.
Some defenders of Mr. Chalabi in the United States say American officials
had encouraged him in his dealings with Iran, urging him to open an office
in Tehran in hopes of improving relations between Iran and Washington.
Those defenders also say they do not believe that his relationship with
Iran involved any exchange of intelligence.
Mr. Chalabi's allies in Washington also saw the Bush administration's
decision to sever its ties with Mr. Chalabi and his group as a cynical
effort instigated by the C.I.A. and longtime Chalabi critics at the State
Department. They believe those agencies want to blame him for mistaken
estimates and incorrect information about Iraq before the war, like whether
Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction.
One of those who has defended Mr. Chalabi is Richard N. Perle, the former
chairman of the Defense Policy Board. "The C.I.A. has disliked him
passionately for a long time and has mounted a campaign against him with
some considerable success," Mr. Perle said Tuesday. "I've seen no evidence
of improper behavior on his part. No evidence whatsoever."
Mr. Perle said he thought the C.I.A. had turned against Mr. Chalabi
because he refused to be the agency's "puppet." Mr. Chalabi "has a mind of
his own," Mr. Perle said.
American intelligence officials said the F.B.I. investigation into the
intelligence leak to Iran did not extend to any charges that Mr. Chalabi
provided the United States with incorrect information, or any allegations
of corruption.
American officials said the leak about the Iranian codes was a serious
loss because the Iranian intelligence service's highly encrypted cable
traffic was a crucial source of information, supplying Washington with
information about Iranian operations inside Iraq, where Tehran's agents
have become increasingly active. It also helped the United States keep
track of Iranian intelligence operations around the world.
Until last month, the Iraqi National Congress had a lucrative contract
with the Defense Intelligence Agency to provide information about Iraq.
Before the United States invasion last year, the group arranged for Iraqi
defectors to provide the Pentagon with information about Saddam Hussein's
government, particularly evidence purporting to show that Baghdad had
active programs to develop weapons of mass destruction. Today, the American
intelligence community believes that much of the information passed by the
defectors was either wrong or fabricated.
--
-----------------
R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah@ibuc.com>
The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>
44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
