[145270] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [cryptography] What's the state of the art in factorization?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Zooko O'Whielacronx)
Fri Jul 9 12:30:09 2010

In-Reply-To: <4BD16EF5.7000001@ciphergoth.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 07:33:27 -0600
From: "Zooko O'Whielacronx" <zookog@gmail.com>
To: Paul Crowley <paul@ciphergoth.org>
Cc: Discussion of cryptography and related <cryptography@randombit.net>, tahoe-dev <tahoe-dev@allmydata.org>, 
	cryptography@metzdowd.com

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Paul Crowley <paul@ciphergoth.org> wrote:
>
> My preferred signature scheme is the second, DDH-based one in the linked
> paper, since it produces shorter signatures - are there any proposals which
> improve on that?

http://eprint.iacr.org/2007/019

Has one. Caveat lector.

Regards,

Zooko

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post