|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: Greg Rose <ggr@qualcomm.com> Cc: "cryptography\@metzdowd.com" <cryptography@metzdowd.com> From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 23:07:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <35D564E5-1109-4C61-8FC8-DF32289CA332@qualcomm.com> (Greg Rose's message of "Thu\, 30 Apr 2009 19\:54\:43 -0700") Greg Rose <ggr@qualcomm.com> writes: >> This is a very important result. The need to transition from SHA-1 >> is no longer theoretical. > > It already wasn't theoretical... if you know what I mean. The writing > has been on the wall since Wang's attacks four years ago. Sure, but this should light a fire under people for things like TLS 1.2. Perry -- Perry E. Metzger perry@piermont.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |