[14421] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Monoculture

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Don Davis)
Thu Oct 2 11:35:28 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <3F7AF751.90601@aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 08:26:13 -0400
To: Jill Ramonsky <Jill.Ramonsky@aculab.com>
From: Don Davis <don@mit.edu>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com

perry wrote:
>> We could use more implementations of ssl and
>> of ssh, no question.
>> ...more cleanly implemented and simpler to use
>> versions of existing algorithms and protocols...
>> would be of tremendous utility.

jill ramonsky replied:
> I am very much hoping that you can answer both (a)
> and (b) with a yes, in which case I will /definitely/
> get on with recoding SSL:
> Is it possible for Bob to instruct his browser to 
> (a) refuse to trust anything signed by Eve, and
> (b) to trust Alice's certificate  (which she handed
>     to him personally)? (And if so, how?)

how it's done depends on the browser:

in Moz 1.0:  Edit > Preferences... > Privacy & Security >
             Certificates > Manage Certificates >
            {Authorities, Web Sites}

in MSIE 5:   Edit > Preferences.., > Web Browser >
             Security > Certificate Authorities

            (there seems to be no way to tell MSIE 5 to
             trust Alice's server cert for SSL connections,
             except to tell MSIE 5 to trust Alice's CA.)

in NS 4.75:  Communicator > Tools > Security Info >
             Certificates > {Signers, Web Sites}

					- don davis, boston







-

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post