[143979] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Property RIghts in Keys
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Perry E. Metzger)
Thu Feb 12 14:43:28 2009
To: Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:33:33 -0500
In-Reply-To: <1028365c0902121124sa1d1672w8950b8340b3e509a@mail.gmail.com> (Donald Eastlake's message of "Thu\, 12 Feb 2009 14\:24\:38 -0500")
Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Perry E. Metzger <perry@piermont.com> wrote:
>> sbg@acw.com writes:
>>> ...
>>
>> There are four kinds of intellectual property. Is it a trade secret?
>> No. Is it a trademark or something allied like trade dress? No. Is it
>> patentable? No. Is it copyrightable? No.
>
> So, depending on how creative the extension fields are :-), or may not
> dependent on that, why isn't it copyrightable?
Perhaps if you put an original novel into an extension field you can
manage it. I don't think GeoTrust was doing anything like that.
Again, though, one has to question what is even to be gained by the
most avaricious of CAs by claiming rights in their certs. It isn't
like there is some clear benefit.
Perry
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
