[14286] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
RE: why are CAs charging so much for certs anyway? (Re: End of the line for Ireland's dotcom star)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul E. Robichaux)
Thu Sep 25 22:56:45 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 17:27:16 -0400
From: "Paul E. Robichaux" <paul@robichaux.net>
To: <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
Comodo is a sub-CA of GTE, so it's pretty decent. On my machines here, I =
did
have to install their subordinate CA cert, but it was a simple matter to =
add
it to the AD CTL.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cryptography@metzdowd.com
[mailto:owner-cryptography@metzdowd.com] On Behalf Of Dave Howe
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:38 AM
To: Email List: Cryptography
Subject: Re: why are CAs charging so much for certs anyway? (Re: End of =
the
line for Ireland's dotcom star)
Joel Sing wrote:
> Hi Adam,
> I believe they have, at least to a large degree. InstantSSL
> (www.instantssl.com) sell 128-bit certificates for $49USD/annum.
> Certainly far cheaper than the VeriSign or Thawte equivalent. This is
> their 'base' level service which comes with a $50USD warranty, email
> based support and a 30 day refund/reissue policy. One of our clients
> uses one of their certificates and we haven't had an issue with it.
What is their browser coverage like?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to =
majordomo@metzdowd.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
