![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com To: die@dieconsulting.com, gnu@new.toad.com Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com In-Reply-To: Message from Dave Emery <die@dieconsulting.com> of "Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:10:08 EDT." <20030909021008.GJ1750@pig.dieconsulting.com> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:20:48 -0700 From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com> > And this says nothing at all about the need for tactical > military wiretaps on GSM systems under battlefield conditions when > soldiers lives may depend on determining what the enemy is saying over > cellphones used to direct attacks against friendly forces. Or when innocent civilians need secure wireless infrastructures, to be able to coordinate to avoid murderous US military forces. See, for example: http://electroniciraq.net/news/1014.shtml which I found via SF writer James P. Hogan's blog: http://www.jamesphogan.com/bb/bb.shtml Prudent citizens should now know that before stepping into the street to hail a taxi, they should use a secure phone to determine whether any American tanks are in the area. But beware of American direction-finding equipment -- make those calls short! John --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |