[14113] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Who needs secure wireless / tappable wireless infrastructure

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Gilmore)
Tue Sep 9 11:03:57 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: die@dieconsulting.com, gnu@new.toad.com
Cc: cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: Message from Dave Emery <die@dieconsulting.com> 
   of "Mon, 08 Sep 2003 22:10:08 EDT." <20030909021008.GJ1750@pig.dieconsulting.com> 
Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 21:20:48 -0700
From: John Gilmore <gnu@toad.com>

> 	And this says nothing at all about the need for tactical
> military wiretaps on GSM systems under battlefield conditions when
> soldiers lives may depend on determining what the enemy is saying over
> cellphones used to direct attacks against friendly forces.

Or when innocent civilians need secure wireless infrastructures, to be
able to coordinate to avoid murderous US military forces.  See, for
example:

  http://electroniciraq.net/news/1014.shtml

which I found via SF writer James P. Hogan's blog:

  http://www.jamesphogan.com/bb/bb.shtml

Prudent citizens should now know that before stepping into the street
to hail a taxi, they should use a secure phone to determine whether
any American tanks are in the area.  But beware of American
direction-finding equipment -- make those calls short!

	John


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post