|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 14:34:25 -0400 From: Ian Grigg <iang@systemics.com> Reply-To: iang@systemics.com To: Steve Schear <s.schear@comcast.net> Cc: cypherpunks@lne.com, cryptography@metzdowd.com Steve Schear wrote: > By combining a mandated digital cash system for contributions, a cap on the > size of each individual contribution (perhaps as small as $100), randomized > delays (perhaps up to a few weeks) in the "posting" of each transaction to > the account of the counter party, it could create mix conditions which > would thwart the ability of contributors to easily convince candidates and > parties that they were the source of particular funds and therefore > entitled to special treatment. How would you audit such a system? I'm not that up on political cash, but I would have expected that there would be a need to figure out where money was coming from, by some interested third party at least. Also there would be a need to prove that the funds were getting there, otherwise, I'd be the first to jump in there and run the mix. Or, the mint. iang --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |