[14019] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Is cryptography where security took the wrong branch?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (D. K. Smetters)
Thu Sep 4 15:00:59 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:18:06 PDT
From: "D. K. Smetters" <smetters@parc.com>
To: EKR <ekr@rtfm.com>
Cc: iang@systemics.com, crypto <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <kj7k4q9cke.fsf@romeo.rtfm.com>
> Eric Rescorla wrote:
>> Ian Grigg <iang@systemics.com> writes:
>
>>I'm almost convinced that WEP is a failure, but
>>I think it retains some residual value.
>
> I agree. After all, I occasionally come upon a network I'd
> like to use and WEP stops me cause I'm too lazy. On the other
> hand, MAC restrictions would have done just as well for that.
>
I find WEP very useful for one thing -- given the habit of
many wireless clients to opportunistically jump onto any
network they happen to find, turning on WEP keeps users
from accidentally "falling" onto networks by mistake. This
saves a lot of confusion if you have the occaisional research
network with say, different firewalling properties than a user
might expect, or one that doesn't actually route to the outside
world. And it's easier to manage than MAC filtering.
--d
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
