[13544] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Quantum crypto, from BBC
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Stewart)
Tue Jun 10 09:04:06 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2003 23:42:24 -0700
To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
From: Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>
Cc: Udhay Shankar N <udhay@pobox.com>
In-Reply-To: <3EE21655.5010204@monmouth.com>
At 12:44 PM 06/07/2003 -0400, John S. Denker wrote:
>On 06/07/2003 08:04 AM, Udhay Shankar N wrote:
>>I haven't seen this discussed here yet.
I hadn't seen this particular implementation of it discussed here
before your posting, but as John points out, the topic has been discussed.
It's somewhat cool, but not particularly useful.
>On the scale of physics hype, quantum crypto in
>particular and quantum computation in general are
>nowhere near as bad as cold fusion, but perhaps
>comparable to high-Tc superconductors, which had
>a definite basis in fact, but their practicality
>was wildly overclaimed.
Quantum computers that can actually do factoring of usefully
large numbers would have a major impact on the whole crypto field.
But quantum cryptography for sending messages
is seldom any more useful than sending an occasional courier
with a briefcase handcuffed to his arm,
which probably costs a lot less than stringing fiber.
It's also not very useful for preventing traffic analysis :-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
