[13513] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: Nullsoft's WASTE communication system
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Werner Koch)
Sun Jun 8 17:47:09 2003
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@metzdowd.com
To: Kevin Elliott <k-elliott@wiu.edu>
Cc: EKR <ekr@rtfm.com>, bear <bear@sonic.net>,
Bill Stewart <bill.stewart@pobox.com>, <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
From: Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2003 21:07:49 +0200
In-Reply-To: <p05200f01bb05b1dfa3b0@[192.168.1.101]> (Kevin Elliott's
message of "Thu, 5 Jun 2003 19:52:28 -0700")
On Thu, 5 Jun 2003 19:52:28 -0700, Kevin Elliott said:
> Out of curiosity, how does the performance of AES compare to Blowfish
> (seeing as how performance would be the obvious advantage of Blowfish
Encrypt/decrypt time for Libgcrypt:
Algo ECB CBC CFB CTR
---------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------
3DES 1120ms 1130ms 1140ms 1170ms 1200ms 1190ms 1410ms 1400ms
BLOWFISH 350ms 340ms 370ms 380ms 430ms 430ms 630ms 630ms
AES 290ms 310ms 340ms 360ms 410ms 410ms 620ms 620ms
AES256 400ms 410ms 440ms 470ms 510ms 510ms 730ms 720ms
> over 3DES)? Also are there any patent/license constraints on AES (the
There are no constraints on AES usage.
Shalom-Salam,
Werner
--
Werner Koch <wk@gnupg.org>
The GnuPG Experts http://g10code.com
Free Software Foundation Europe http://fsfeurope.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
