[129771] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Strength in Complexity?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tim Hudson)
Mon Aug 4 17:47:18 2008

Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 05:20:48 +1000
From: Tim Hudson <tim.hudson@attglobal.net>
To: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <87iqugeh41.fsf@snark.cb.piermont.com>

Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> Arshad Noor <arshad.noor@strongauth.com> writes:
>> - after all people didn't really need DBMS's 30 years
>> ago because they could do all the data-management operations
>> inside each application quite well, thank you!
> 
> I think that comparing the advance SQL made with SKMS seems a bit
> unreasonable.

I think that Arshad's point here is an argument that externalising key
management handling from normal application logic is a valid one but that it is
also equally applicable to existing Kerberos environments.

I don't think a point beyond "externalisation is good" was trying to be made here.

Tim

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post