[12907] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: Run a remailer, go to jail?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Trei, Peter)
Mon Mar 31 12:37:07 2003

X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
X-Original-To: cryptography@wasabisystems.com
From: "Trei, Peter" <ptrei@rsasecurity.com>
To: "'Sidney Markowitz '" <sidney@sidney.com>,
	"'cryptography@wasabisystems.com '" <cryptography@wasabisystems.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 23:54:41 -0500

Sidney Markowitz writes:

>> They both require that the use of such technologies be for
>> the purpose of committing a crime.

>The Massachusetts law defines as a crime:

>(b) Offense defined.--Any person commits an offense if he knowingly

>(1) possesses, uses, manufactures, develops, assembles, distributes,
>transfers, imports into this state, licenses, leases, sells or offers,
>promotes or advertises for sale, use or distribution any communication
>device:

>[ ... ] or;

>(ii) to conceal or to assist another to conceal from any communication
>service provider, or from any lawful authority, the existence or place
>of origin or destination of any communication;

>[...]

>(5)  Assist others in committing any of the acts prohibited by this
>section.


To heck with remailers, anonymizing proxies, etal. As I read this,
the USPO is liable if it accepts a letter without a correct return
address.

Peter Trei


---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@wasabisystems.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post