[127813] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: how bad is IPETEE?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Nicolas Williams)
Thu Jul 10 16:18:22 2008
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:22:07 -0500
From: Nicolas Williams <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
To: Eugen Leitl <eugen@leitl.org>
Cc: Cryptography List <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <20080710161027.GO9875@leitl.org>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 06:10:27PM +0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
> In case somebody missed it,
>
> http://www.tfr.org/wiki/index.php?title=Technical_Proposal_(IPETEE)
I did miss it. Thanks for the link. I don't think in-band key exchange
is desirable here, but, you never know what will triumph in the
marketplace.
> I'm not sure what the status of http://postel.org/anonsec/
> is, the mailing list traffic dried up a while back.
Connection latching, which is the BTNS WG equivalent of 'IPETEE', but
much simpler, is in the IESG's hands now.
Nico
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
