[123000] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: It seems being in an explosion isn't enough...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ali, Saqib)
Fri May 9 17:10:08 2008
Date: Fri, 9 May 2008 13:44:23 -0700
From: "Ali, Saqib" <docbook.xml@gmail.com>
To: "Leichter, Jerry" <leichter_jerrold@emc.com>
Cc: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>, cryptography@metzdowd.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.4.61.0805082324370.6168@mental>
> Edwards said the Seagate hard drive -- which was
> about eight years old in 2003 -- featured much
> greater fault tolerance and durability than current
> hard drives of similar capacity.
I am not so sure about this statement. The newer drives are far more
ruggedized and superior in constuction. For e.g. the newer EE25 are
designed to "operate" @
1) Operating temperatures of =9630=B0C to 85=B0C
2) Operating altitudes from =961000 feet to 16,400 feet
3) Operating vibration up to 2.0 Gs
4) Long-duration (11 ms) shock capability of 150 Gs
where as the older ST9385AG:
1) Operating temperatures of 5=B0 to 55=B0C (41=B0 to 131=B0F)
2) Operating altitudes from =961,000 ft to 10,000 ft (=96300 m to 3,000 m)
3) Operating vibration up to 0.5 Gs
4) shock capability of 100 Gs
Source:
http://www.seagate.com/docs/pdf/datasheet/disc/ds_ee25_2.pdf
http://www.seagate.com/support/disc/manuals/ata/9655pma.pdf
saqib
http://doctrina.wordpress.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com
