[121233] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Cruising the stacks and finding stuff

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Victor Duchovni)
Mon Apr 21 13:50:14 2008

Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:43:55 -0400
From: Victor Duchovni <Victor.Duchovni@morganstanley.com>
To: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Cryptography <cryptography@metzdowd.com>
In-Reply-To: <480960C4.20207@sound-by-design.com>

On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 08:02:28PM -0700, Allen wrote:

> Granted A5/1 is known to be very weak, but how much weaker than 
> AES-128? Ten orders of magnitude? I haven't a clue ...

This is usually the point where I stop reading. Of course 10 orders of
magnitude is ~33 bits, so unless the A5 attacks crack a cipher with ~95
bits security, the estimate is grossly wrong.

If (generously) A5 is 64 bits of work, AES is ~20 orders of magnitude
stronger.

-- 

 /"\ ASCII RIBBON                  NOTICE: If received in error,
 \ / CAMPAIGN     Victor Duchovni  please destroy and notify
  X AGAINST       IT Security,     sender. Sender does not waive
 / \ HTML MAIL    Morgan Stanley   confidentiality or privilege,
                                   and use is prohibited.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo@metzdowd.com

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post