[1052] in cryptography@c2.net mail archive
Re: (Fwd) New crypto bill clears committee
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Marc Horowitz)
Sat Jun 21 17:31:04 1997
To: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Cc: cryptography@c2.net
From: Marc Horowitz <marc@cygnus.com>
Date: 21 Jun 1997 17:21:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: Kent Crispin's message of Sat, 21 Jun 1997 09:03:49 -0700
Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com> writes:
>> You have to distinguish between GAK and CACK (Corporate Access to
>> Corporate Keys). Many people believe there is a good case for the
>> latter, but not the former. In fact, the "11 cryptographers" paper
>> says this.
There is a case for CACK for stored data, but not communications. I
don't recall seeing any such distinction in the McCain-Kerrey bill.
Marc
