[78] in The Cryptographic File System users list
Re: Annoying CFS bug fixed
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Travis Hassloch)
Fri May 15 21:40:21 1998
From owner-cfs-users@research.att.com Sat May 16 01:40:20 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cfs-users@research.att.com>
Delivered-To: cfs-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 772 invoked from network); 16 May 1998 01:40:19 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO rumor.research.att.com) (192.20.225.9)
by bloom-picayune.mit.edu with SMTP; 16 May 1998 01:40:19 -0000
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Fri May 15 21:35:16 EDT 1998
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research-clone; Fri May 15 21:37:26 EDT 1998
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id VAA29651;
Fri, 15 May 1998 21:37:05 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id VAA21841 for cfs-users-list; Fri, 15 May 1998 21:32:27 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from research.att.com (research-clone.research.att.com [135.207.30.100]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id VAA21806 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Fri, 15 May 1998 21:32:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from homer.dejanews.com ([205.238.143.161]) by research-clone; Fri May 15 21:33:21 EDT 1998
Received: from otto.dejanews.com (root@otto.dejanews.com [205.238.143.177])
by homer.dejanews.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id UAA05054;
Fri, 15 May 1998 20:33:20 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from otto.dejanews.com (travish@localhost.dejanews.com [127.0.0.1]) by otto.dejanews.com (8.7.6/8.6.12) with ESMTP id UAA18310; Fri, 15 May 1998 20:33:18 -0500
Message-Id: <199805160133.UAA18310@otto.dejanews.com>
To: Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
cc: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: Re: Annoying CFS bug fixed
X-PGP-keyid: C7FDD3D5
X-PGP-fingerprint: 7A 48 DD 46 E6 7F 11 E7 8F 7E 53 9A DF 33 9E FA
X-Copyright: Copyright (c) 1998 Travis Hassloch
X-Disclaimer: This email is my personal opinion only.
X-URI: <URL:http://www.tripod.com/~travcom>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 26 Apr 1998 20:17:08 EDT."
<199804270017.UAA29658@fbi>
Date: Fri, 15 May 1998 20:33:18 -0500
From: Travis Hassloch <travish@dejanews.com>
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
In message <199804270017.UAA29658@fbi>, Matt Blaze writes:
>I think things like IPSEC and ssh have made esm pretty much obsolete, but
>it still is the only way to get end-to-end security through certain
>firewall configurations, so I'm a bit reluctant to declare it dead.
I am not so confident. I have a feeling many people won't have
IPSEC for a while.
At the last Usenix Security Symposium, Peter Gutmann expressed some
concerns about the [P]RNG architecture used by ssh.
Maybe a little diversity in secure clients isn't such a bad thing.
Is stel still alive?
--
Travis Hassloch, Database Administrator; Dobbs-tested, Mother-approved
