[29] in The Cryptographic File System users list
Re: CFS code to be reorganized (and downsized)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Blaze)
Tue Dec 23 01:22:27 1997
From owner-cfs-users@research.att.com Tue Dec 23 01:22:21 1997
Received: from rumor.research.att.com (rumor.research.att.com [192.20.225.9]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.7.6/2.3JIK) with SMTP id BAA15005 for <cfs-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu>; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 01:22:20 -0500
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Tue Dec 23 01:19:15 EST 1997
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research-clone; Tue Dec 23 01:20:05 EST 1997
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA16603;
Tue, 23 Dec 1997 01:19:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id BAA25592 for cfs-users-list; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 01:20:03 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com (amontillado.research.att.com [135.207.24.32]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA25586 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 01:20:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (root@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA16598;
Tue, 23 Dec 1997 01:19:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (mab@localhost.research.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id BAA25578; Tue, 23 Dec 1997 01:19:59 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199712230619.BAA25578@nsa.research.att.com>
To: "Henry B. Hotz" <hotz@jpl.nasa.gov>
cc: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: Re: CFS code to be reorganized (and downsized)
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 22 Dec 1997 14:25:45 PST."
<v04002d00b0c4990cf0f9@[137.79.51.141]>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 1997 01:19:58 -0500
From: Matt Blaze <mab@research.att.com>
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
>At 2:02 PM -0800 12/22/97, Matt Blaze wrote:
>>Have I left anyone out? If you're using anything other than BSDI,
>>FreeBSD, or OpenBSD on an x86, SunOS or Solaris 2.x on a Sparc, or
>>Irix on an SGI box, please let me know so I can at least feel guilty
>>about abandoning you.
>
>How about non-x86 *BSD? In addition to Solaris I run NetBSD/Mac (though I
>haven't tried CFS on it yet).
>
>Signature failed Preliminary Design Review.
>Feasibility of a new signature is currently being evaluated.
>h.b.hotz@jpl.nasa.gov, or hbhotz@oxy.edu
>
>
Well, non '86 BSD won't be a supported platform. While I have no reason
to believe that it wouldn't work just fine, I'm not going to go
out of my way to try to develop for platforms I don't have and can't test.
If it stops working on your platform and you have specific fixes, I will,
as always, include patches in future releases.
-matt
