[27] in The Cryptographic File System users list
Re: CFS code to be reorganized (and downsized)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Bartholomew)
Mon Dec 22 23:02:21 1997
From owner-cfs-users@research.att.com Mon Dec 22 23:02:20 1997
Received: from rumor.research.att.com (rumor.research.att.com [192.20.225.9]) by bloom-picayune.MIT.EDU (8.7.6/2.3JIK) with SMTP id XAA12447 for <cfs-mtg@bloom-picayune.mit.edu>; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 23:02:19 -0500
Received: from research.att.com ([135.207.30.100]) by rumor; Mon Dec 22 22:59:15 EST 1997
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com ([135.207.24.32]) by research-clone; Mon Dec 22 22:59:22 EST 1997
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA15295;
Mon, 22 Dec 1997 22:59:16 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id WAA25341 for cfs-users-list; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 22:59:24 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from research.att.com (research-clone.research.att.com [135.207.30.100]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id WAA25337 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 22:59:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: from kansas.pn.com ([204.96.36.40]) by research-clone; Mon Dec 22 22:57:59 EST 1997
Received: from battleship (godzilla-06.openface.ca [207.81.61.228])
by kansas.pn.com (8.8.6/8.8.0) with ESMTP id WAA14249; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 22:57:56 -0500 (EST)
Received: (bb@localhost) by battleship (8.8.5/8.6.12) id WAA02794; Mon, 22 Dec 1997 22:05:34 -0500
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 1997 22:05:34 -0500
Message-Id: <199712230305.WAA02794@battleship>
From: Brian Bartholomew <bb@wv.com>
To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: Re: CFS code to be reorganized (and downsized)
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
> Have I left anyone out? If you're using anything other than BSDI,
> FreeBSD, or OpenBSD on an x86, SunOS or Solaris 2.x on a Sparc, or
> Irix on an SGI box, please let me know so I can at least feel guilty
> about abandoning you.
Linux on x86!
Another member of the League for Programming Freedom (LPF) www.lpf.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Brian Bartholomew - bb@wv.com - www.wv.com - Working Version, Cambridge, MA
