[269] in The Cryptographic File System users list
other users of CFS?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Reardon)
Wed Sep 4 10:43:56 2002
From owner-cfs-users@crypto.com Wed Sep 04 14:43:56 2002
Return-Path: <owner-cfs-users@crypto.com>
Delivered-To: cfs-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 19219 invoked from network); 4 Sep 2002 14:43:56 -0000
Received: from mx.crypto.com (207.140.168.138)
by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 4 Sep 2002 14:43:56 -0000
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
by MultiHostMXServer (8.9.3/8.9.x4) id KAA15693
for cfs-users-list; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:31:00 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dockmaster.research.att.com (H-135-207-24-155.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by MultiHostMXServer (8.9.3/8.9.x4) with ESMTP id KAA28173
for <cfs-users@crypto.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:30:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102])
by dockmaster.research.att.com (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g84Dwgxi009758
for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 09:58:42 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix)
id 766F54CE62; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Received: from janus (fpfw.research.att.com [135.207.1.2])
by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 191474CE1E
for <cfs-users@research.att.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:30:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-red.research.att.com ([192.20.225.110]) by janus; Wed, 04 Sep 2002 10:28:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from postfixfilter@localhost)
by mail-red.research.att.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g84EWw919177
for cfs-users@research.att.com; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:32:58 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: mail-red.research.att.com: postfixfilter set sender to badger@goldwiretech.com using -f
Received: from bond.goldwiretech.com (bond.goldwiretech.com [63.150.239.226])
by mail-red.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0C91AB498
for <cfs-users@research.att.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:32:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from bibi.goldwiretech.com (IDENT:root@bibi [10.0.0.65])
by bond.goldwiretech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA29247
for <cfs-users@research.att.com>; Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:30:24 -0400
Received: (from badger@localhost)
by bibi.goldwiretech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA18113;
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:30:24 -0400
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2002 10:30:24 -0400
Message-Id: <200209041430.KAA18113@bibi.goldwiretech.com>
From: John Reardon <badger@goldwiretech.com>
To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: other users of CFS?
Reply-To: badger@goldwiretech.com (John Reardon 781/398-8800)
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=SUBJ_ENDS_IN_Q_MARK version=2.20
X-Spam-Level:
Sender: owner-cfs-users@crypto.com
Precedence: bulk
Intro: I am new to the list. I am an engineer who has to investigate
moving our file archive to live in encrypted form on the disk. Our
product is a bunch of software that we ship on a custom Solaris box
running OS version 2.8.
I got CFS working locally - it is pretty nice. I also was going to
investigate Cryptfs
(http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~ezk/research/cryptfs/index.html) for 2
improvements (speed and the concept of the 'session id'). I was
interested in any stories, anecdotes, etc. of experiences with these 2
different systems. Since we control the system, I am not put off by
the fact that cryptfs is a kernel module.
I get the impression that CFS might be in more general use and that
Cryptfs might be more of a PhD project that isn't in 'real use' as
much. I could be totally wrong about this. I was wondering what
others' think.
Thanks!
--
=======================================================
John Reardon mailto:badger@goldwiretech.com
Gold Wire Technology phone: +1 781 398-8800
