[231] in The Cryptographic File System users list

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Upgrading

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pierre Abbat)
Mon Aug 6 08:24:47 2001

From owner-cfs-users@crypto.com Mon Aug 06 12:24:47 2001
Return-Path: <owner-cfs-users@crypto.com>
Delivered-To: cfs-mtg@CHARON.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 12009 invoked from network); 6 Aug 2001 12:24:47 -0000
Received: from mx.crypto.com (207.140.168.138)
  by charon.mit.edu with SMTP; 6 Aug 2001 12:24:47 -0000
Received: (from majordomo@localhost)
	by MultiHostMXServer (8.9.3/8.9.x4) id IAA05585
	for cfs-users-list; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: mx.crypto.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@crypto.com using -f
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (H-135-207-24-155.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
	by MultiHostMXServer (8.9.3/8.9.x4) with ESMTP id IAA06983
	for <cfs-users@crypto.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:06:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA13368 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:06:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix)
	id 0ED2A1E049; Mon,  6 Aug 2001 08:06:55 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Received: from neofelis.ixazon.lan (unknown [216.189.29.97])
	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85DFF1E03A
	for <cfs-users@research.att.com>; Mon,  6 Aug 2001 08:06:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by neofelis.ixazon.lan (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 5ED233C55D; Mon,  6 Aug 2001 08:04:37 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@oltronics.net>
Reply-To: phma@oltronics.net
To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: Upgrading
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2001 08:01:21 -0400
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29.2]
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01080608043706.01174@neofelis>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-cfs-users@crypto.com
Precedence: bulk

I am upgrading my system and in the process broke cfs 1.3.3-bt, which I
installed from an RPM. I was using it with blowfish. If I upgrade to 1.4.0,
should I expect any problems?

phma

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post