[183] in The Cryptographic File System users list
are there many active users of cfs still here?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Brian Edmonds)
Tue May 23 11:50:52 2000
From owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com Tue May 23 15:50:52 2000
Return-Path: <owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>
Delivered-To: cfs-mtg@CHARON2.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 3444 invoked from network); 23 May 2000 15:50:52 -0000
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (135.207.30.102)
by charon2.mit.edu with SMTP; 23 May 2000 15:50:52 -0000
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com (amontillado.research.att.com [135.207.24.32])
by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 160064CE2C; Tue, 23 May 2000 11:50:48 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA20865;
Tue, 23 May 2000 11:50:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA18587 for cfs-users-list; Tue, 23 May 2000 11:47:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (mail-blue.research.att.com [135.207.30.102]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA18583 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Tue, 23 May 2000 11:47:47 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix)
id EDFAA4CE24; Tue, 23 May 2000 11:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
Delivered-To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Received: from lios.gweep.bc.ca (a3a17164.sympatico.bconnected.net [209.53.11.73])
by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338D44CE23
for <cfs-users@research.att.com>; Tue, 23 May 2000 11:50:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
by lios.gweep.bc.ca (8.9.3/8.9.1) with UUCP id IAA09242
for cfs-users@research.att.com; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:50:16 -0700
Received: by yuri.gweep.bc.ca (Postfix, from userid 500)
id 33FDC56B38; Tue, 23 May 2000 08:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: are there many active users of cfs still here?
From: Brian Edmonds <brian@gweep.bc.ca>
Date: 23 May 2000 08:10:37 -0700
In-Reply-To: Ollivier Robert's message of "Tue, 23 May 2000 11:05:26 +0200"
Message-ID: <m3wvklxpxu.fsf@yuri.gweep.bc.ca>
Lines: 28
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0806 (Gnus v5.8.6) XEmacs/21.1 (Bryce Canyon)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I just joined the list a week ago, and your post was the first I've seen
Ollivier. Is this code still being actively developed and stored
somewhere I couldn't find in my web searches? I noticed a project from
Italy to do a crypto fs that appeared to be pretty well developed, but
it was 2.0 kernel based, rather than the more flexible (though slower)
user space approach that CFS uses.
I'm also using CFS 1.4.0b2, on my laptop, and had to do a bit of hacking
to get it to work with my SuSE 6.4 Linux distribution. In two of the
files a couple variables were generated without (or later with, I'm not
conversant with rpcgen) leading underscores that I added in manually.
Also the random number generating module would never exit for me, so I
hacked it out and replaced it with reads from /dev/urandom.
Brian.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org/>
iD8DBQE5Kp9ocCEFQUX5+OwRAnJKAJ44OHJ/J37YZuOxa7YggLrtPLuENQCgs2B9
Uyhs5FYw9kmhA/m/OhuyaTE=
=WKvA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
