[168] in The Cryptographic File System users list
Re: cfs and list status
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Anthony R Iano-Fletcher)
Mon Mar 13 11:23:04 2000
From owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com Mon Mar 13 16:23:04 2000
Return-Path: <owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>
Delivered-To: cfs-mtg@CHARON2.mit.edu
Received: (qmail 1457 invoked from network); 13 Mar 2000 16:23:04 -0000
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (135.207.30.102)
by charon2.mit.edu with SMTP; 13 Mar 2000 16:23:04 -0000
Received: from amontillado.research.att.com (amontillado.research.att.com [135.207.24.32])
by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id CD18C4CE13; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:22:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nsa.research.att.com (majordomo@nsa.research.att.com [135.207.24.155])
by amontillado.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id LAA27100;
Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:23:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA01040 for cfs-users-list; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:21:23 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: nsa.research.att.com: majordomo set sender to owner-cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com using -f
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (mail-green.research.att.com [135.207.30.103]) by nsa.research.att.com (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA01036 for <cfs-users@nsa.research.att.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:21:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix)
id 3C2681E01A; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:22:01 -0500 (EST)
Delivered-To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Received: from argo.cit.nih.gov (argo.cit.nih.gov [165.112.92.24])
by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCD41E018
for <cfs-users@research.att.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:22:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from argo.cit.nih.gov (argo.cit.nih.gov [165.112.92.24])
by argo.cit.nih.gov (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA11109
for <cfs-users@research.att.com>; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:21:56 -0500 (EST)
From: Anthony R Iano-Fletcher <Anthony.Iano-Fletcher@cbel.cit.nih.gov>
Received: by argo.cit.nih.gov (8.9.1b+Sun) id LAA11105; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:21:56 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 11:21:56 -0500
To: cfs-users@research.att.com
Subject: Re: cfs and list status
Message-ID: <20000313112156.A9731@argo.cit.nih.gov>
Mail-Followup-To: cfs-users@research.att.com
References: <200003122141.QAA28388@pebble> <20000313034022.F1631@wyvern.ptw.com> <03a801bf8cc5$eacad2f0$8000000a@Matador>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <03a801bf8cc5$eacad2f0$8000000a@Matador>; from dorsey@lila.com on Mon, Mar 13, 2000 at 12:27:04AM -0800
Sender: owner-cfs-users@research.att.com
Precedence: bulk
Hi
Bill Dorsey wrote:
> Check out tcfs (Transparent Cryptographic File System) at
> http://tcfs.dia.unisa.it .....
> If you are running some
> other flavor of Unix, you'll have to stick with CFS for now.
This is a strength of CFS over TCFS. I can run it on Solaris, SGIs
and Linux and have everything work together.
Glenn Holmer wrote:
> I am still using CFS. Isn't it linked against an older libc?
> Should I be worried that it will eventually become unusable?
you can always try to recompile it from scratch.
Matt Blaze wrote:
> out a minor release "any day now", with a major release to follow once
> I can set aside some coding time.
This is good news. I have been a very satisfied user of CFS over the
last few years. Thanks very much.
> I started work on this in earnest about a month ago, though there have
> been
> a bunch of distractions that have gotten in the way. Realistically,
> I expect to have a beta release of CFS2.0 out in about 4-5 weeks.
I look forward to it. I'm happy to some test driving under Solaris, IRIX and
Linux.
> Sorry for ignoring this for so long.
I'm glad to see that CFS hasnt been abandoned.
Anthony.
--
Anthony R Iano-Fletcher Anthony.Iano-Fletcher@nih.gov
http://cbel.cit.nih.gov/~arif
CBEL, CIT, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Phone: (+1) 301 402 1741.
