[23072] in APO-L
Re: [APO-L] Felony
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Finder)
Thu Oct 31 14:22:22 2002
"Reply-To: "
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 14:21:06 -0400
Reply-To: Randy Finder <naraht@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
From: Randy Finder <naraht@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To: <F32001085EA6D211B61B00805F6FE69E04EAD5F1@exchsv2.ogsnet.ogs.state.ny.us>
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info.
--Boundary_(ID_9KOll8mt2BnWPy7OCeWfWA)
Content-id: <Pine.PMDF.3.95.1021031141911.538988272g@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=iso-8859-1
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002, Vehlow, Richard wrote:
> Upon seeing this discussion, suppose this amendment were amended to read
> "brothers must be found guilty of a crime of public record or an
> institutional charge, including hazing, to be eligible for suspension or
> expulsion".
>
>
> The argument about matters of trial taking too long to warrant this
> stipulation, so as not to tie the fraternity's hands down is a bit flawed,
> since it can take 2 years anyway to bring such an expulsion proposal up at
> national convention.
I believe today that Suspension can occur very quickly in the board feels
that it is necessary. I think that can be done on a phone vote. I'd like
to get more info from someone who knows...
Randolph Finder
>
> -Rich Vehlow
>
--
Leadership, Friendship and Service - Alpha Phi Omega
--Boundary_(ID_9KOll8mt2BnWPy7OCeWfWA)
Content-id: <Pine.PMDF.3.95.1021031141911.538988272h@DRYCAS.CLUB.CC.CMU.EDU>
Content-type: TEXT/HTML; CHARSET=iso-8859-1
Content-description:
Content-transfer-encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
5.5.2653.12">
<TITLE>Felony</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Upon seeing this discussion, suppose this amendment =
were amended to read "brothers must be found guilty of a crime of =
public record or an institutional charge, including hazing, to be =
eligible for suspension or expulsion".</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Since it's staying at or below the level of felony, =
this amendment is within the scope allowable for amendments to =
proposals.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Would this be more acceptable?</FONT>
</P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The argument about matters of trial taking too long =
to warrant this stipulation, so as not to tie the fraternity's hands =
down is a bit flawed, since it can take 2 years anyway to bring such an =
expulsion proposal up at national convention. </FONT></P>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>-Rich Vehlow</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--Boundary_(ID_9KOll8mt2BnWPy7OCeWfWA)--
