[23069] in APO-L
Re: [APO-L] Felony
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam Gottlieb, Alpha Beta Psi)
Thu Oct 31 08:39:42 2002
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2002 08:25:02 -0500
Reply-To: agottlie@ROANOKE.EDU
From: "Adam Gottlieb, Alpha Beta Psi" <agottlie@ROANOKE.EDU>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To: <F32001085EA6D211B61B00805F6FE69E04EAD5F1@exchsv2.ogsnet.ogs.state.ny.us>
I don't think such an amendment to your proposal would be in scope.
Quoting "Vehlow, Richard" <Richard.Vehlow@OGS.STATE.NY.US>:
> Upon seeing this discussion, suppose this amendment were amended to read
> "brothers must be found guilty of a crime of public record or an
> institutional charge, including hazing, to be eligible for suspension or
> expulsion".
>
> Since it's staying at or below the level of felony, this amendment is
> within
> the scope allowable for amendments to proposals.
>
> Would this be more acceptable?
>
> The argument about matters of trial taking too long to warrant this
> stipulation, so as not to tie the fraternity's hands down is a bit flawed,
> since it can take 2 years anyway to bring such an expulsion proposal up at
> national convention.
>
> -Rich Vehlow
>
