[21196] in APO-L

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: [APO-L] Rush Ideas

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cynthia Maxton)
Tue Sep 19 10:53:31 2000

Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id:  <20000919144325.8681.qmail@web1905.mail.yahoo.com>
Date:         Tue, 19 Sep 2000 07:43:25 -0700
Reply-To: Cynthia Maxton <cem_apo@YAHOO.COM>
From: Cynthia Maxton <cem_apo@YAHOO.COM>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU

I have heard quite a few comments and concerns
regarding the NUMBER of pledges.  The running theme is
that we are in a bad situation because the numbers are
down.

I have yet to hear anyone concerned about the QUALITY
of their pledges.  What I have discovered is that with
a large pledge class, the chapter will be lucky if
even half of them are around a semester later.  With a
smaller pledge class, the percentage of brothers that
remain is higher.

I had an advisor tell me once that an organization
should never try to grow by more than 20% in a year.
This was after our chapter had doubled in size in less
than a year.  Any chapter that has had this type of
'blessing' knows that, in reality, it is anything but
that.  The term 'growing pains' is not just a
fictitious construct.  It can be as difficult for a
chapter to handle as declining membership can be.

What I would like to hear are suggestions to improve
the quality of the pledging process, and ways to
retain membership.

YiLFS,
Cynthia Maxton
Pledge Master
Epsilon Xi - Colorado State University
Alumni Delta Mu - Pittsburg State University
Fall 1998


=====
Dorothy was duped.  There's no place like OZ.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
http://im.yahoo.com/

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post