[19489] in APO-L
Re: Convention Legislation
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert & Lisa Dean)
Sun Oct 25 19:09:48 1998
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 1998 18:06:32 -0600
Reply-To: Robert & Lisa Dean <deanrl@GTE.NET>
From: Robert & Lisa Dean <deanrl@GTE.NET>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
My thoughts:
How many actives comb through the by-laws looking for problems,
technical or otherwise? Beyond that, how many are really familiar with
them? I know I wasn't very familiar with them when I was an active, and
I still don't know everything. (For instance, until I did a search on
"advisor" in the National By-laws one day last year, I didn't know
advisors were eligible to be voting delegates (Article IV, Section 1).
LFS,
Robert Dean
Section 48 Comm Chair
John Grossi wrote:
>
> Mark Allen Stratton wrote:
>
> > Brothers,
> >
> > While reading the legislation for convention, the following thought
> > occurred to me:
> >
> > COULD LEE CORRELL AND THE REGION III STAFF HAVE SUBMITTED ANY *MORE*
> > LEGISLATION?
> >
> > :-) Heh.
> >
> > At the very least, it makes for interesting reading.
> >
>
> My thoughts went the opposite way... Region III staff went and submitted
> that much stuff,
> why did none of the other regions submit legislation? If you actually go
> through that packet you'll discover than under 20 people submitted
> legislation (excluding board
> submitted stuff), I think that's more of a comment than Lee Correll and
> crew submitting
> 39 pieces of legislation. Why is it that so *few* people in an
> organization of 14,000
> active members are submitting legislation? Think about that one for a
> bit...
>
> -John Grossi
> Alumni Omicron Iota - WPI
> Alumni Phi Epsilon - Maine Maritime
