[19438] in APO-L

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Automatic revocation proceedings for felony convictions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Diet Coke Boy)
Thu Oct 22 13:41:15 1998

Date:         Thu, 22 Oct 1998 13:31:04 -0400
Reply-To: Diet Coke Boy <henrymrx@ACCESS5.DIGEX.NET>
From: Diet Coke Boy <henrymrx@ACCESS5.DIGEX.NET>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To:  <v03110709b255011a7511@[128.173.106.41]>

On Thu, 22 Oct 1998, Michael Leahy wrote:

> REV,
>
> Interesting proposals.  Also interesting that a felony conviction would be
> a prerequisite for membership revocation, but only convictions related to
> hazing incidents would require revocation proceedings.
>
> I know I'm nit picking, but what happens if someone is convicted for hazing
> 30 days before convention?  Or 7 days?  Currently, anything proposed under
> Article XIII Section 2 and not received at the National Office 90 days
> prior to convention and distributed to the chapters 80 days prior is
> considered out of order.  Do we have a case where an item is required to be
> presented but is automatically out of order?
>
> And what reference committee would you recommend the proposal for
> membership revocation be referred to (in accordance to Article XIII Section
> 2)?
>
> LFS,
> --Michael

<text of proposal snipped>

REV,

I also feel the need to point something out.  In some states (such as
Maryland), hazing is only a misdemeanor.  So, under your proposal(s),
someone could be tried and convicted of hazing in a court of law and we
still could not throw them out of APO.


Henry Marx - Diet Coke Boy - Mother Hen
henrymrx@access.digex.net / henrymrx@writeme.com
Alpha Phi Omega - Section 84 Staff
-----------------------------------------------------
Please visit DC 2000: http://www.glue.umd.edu/~jrahll
-----------------------------------------------------

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post