[19317] in APO-L
Re: Toast song
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Seth Fulmer)
Thu Oct 8 08:49:14 1998
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 1998 08:39:00 -0400
Reply-To: Seth Fulmer <kaosking@voicenet.com>
From: Seth Fulmer <kaosking@VOICENET.COM>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
In-Reply-To: <361CA6DE.1470386E@sprintmail.com>
I originally had a previous paragraph but it seemed harsh so I cut it
out. So, please bare with me if this seems disjointed. I don't see why
we can't keep it the way it is. I've always viewed "Men of" in the
humanity sense. Those who took latin know that the Romans had 2 words for
men. 1 meaning men(vir) vs. women(femina) and 1 meaning men(homines) vs.
animals/beasts(animalia). If there are those who wish to change "Men of"
because "they're not a man" then I must say there are quite a bit of
chapters out there that have pledged beasts. I for one view no
distinction between men, or women. Of course please don't think I'm
forcing my opinion upon you to make your own. I'm just offering another
viewpoint and a suggestion.
Take care of yourselves and Have an Excellent Day! :)
In Leadership, Friendship, and Service,
Seth D. Fulmer
mailto:kaosking@voicenet.com
