[19294] in APO-L
An Apology, if I offended
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Joann C. Yant)
Wed Oct 7 02:03:20 1998
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 1998 02:03:09 EDT
Reply-To: JoAPO@AOL.COM
From: "Joann C. Yant" <JoAPO@AOL.COM>
To: APO-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--part0_907740189_boundary
Content-ID: <0_907740189@inet_out.mail.aol.com.1>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
--part0_907740189_boundary
Content-ID: <0_907740189@inet_out.mail.aol.com.2>
Content-type: message/rfc822
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-disposition: inline
From: JoAPO@aol.com
Return-path: <JoAPO@aol.com>
To: ellen_kranzer@harvard.edu
Subject: Re: And I notice there have been no responses from Babs anymore?
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 22:01:38 EDT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
I don't recognize any uncalled for language in my response line. I was
stating an observation. She has not responded. Maybe she will, but when I
posted, she had not. That's all there is to that, nothing more. However, I
do recognize that tone can only be implied and absorbed by the reader of
email. I apologize if I offended you, or anyone else, with it.
>The subject line of your message is completely uncalled for.
>And by the way, one reason why there may not have been a response yet, may
>simply be that she hasn't logged on again yet. It has been less that 24 hrs
>since Babs posted. Since most people aren't logged on 24 hrs a day, it isn't
>really reasonable to expect a response yet (and even those of us who are
>logged in 7 x 24 -- or at least it feels like that -- can't always respond
>to everything right away. Babs might even read the list only as rarely as
>once a week.
>Y.I.S.
>Ellen c.c. Kranzer
>APO-L Administrator
--part0_907740189_boundary--
