[511] in SIPB-AFS-requests
volume juggling.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Bill Sommerfeld)
Thu Sep 12 15:35:53 1991
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 91 15:35:13 EDT
From: wesommer@MIT.EDU (Bill Sommerfeld)
To: sipb-afsreq@MIT.EDU
I just did some cleanup on our "structural" volumes.
Namely, root.afs, root.cell, and the "top level" volumes now all have
exactly two replication sites: one on ronald-ann, and one on rosebud.
No longer do we have multiple rep sites on the same machine.
I went patrolling for other replicated volumes and noted that there
were a lot more of them than I thought -- mostly stuff replicated onto
ronald-ann:d.
Do we still need to do this, or do we think that both of "d" and "e"
are "safe" enough that we can rely on our weekly tape backup?
I'm seriously considering moving my athena home directory to the sipb
cell now that there is plenty of disk space; however, I think I may
want to attempt to preserve my "vanity" volume id of "27", which may
be a bit trick to perform.
- Bill
