[453] in SIPB-AFS-requests
Re: Question
dkk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dkk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU)
Wed May 15 00:29:39 1991
> I don't think we should keep the readonly volumes. I think that if
> drive E is flaky, we should move the read-write copies of what's there
> to drive F instead of putting read only replications there.
Both E and F are known to be flakey. Both failed at some point when I
was working on them last...
I haven't caught up on sipb-afs yet, so please excuse me if this was
discussed, but how about just putting all the read-only's on E and F, and
all the read-write's on A, B, C and D?
