[1318] in SIPB-AFS-requests
server migration
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (sorokin@MIT.EDU)
Fri Apr 15 14:46:53 1994
From: sorokin@MIT.EDU
To: sipb-afsreq@MIT.EDU, charon-maintainers@MIT.EDU, rtfm-maintainers@MIT.EDU,
webmaster@MIT.EDU, usenet@MIT.EDU
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 94 14:45:50 EDT
Well, Matt and Greg and Jonathan and Chad and I discussed this some
because I was bored over here at the help desk, and now they've dumped
me in favor of Matt's whiteboard, but here's what I predict anyway:
either a) we get another maxine and put the web on that, or b)
bed -> ss10 (pumped) (ds5000.200 goes away)
rtfm -> ss10 (ds5000.25 freed)
beacon -> ss10 (ds5000.25 freed)
rosebud -> old beacon (ds5000.25)
charon (discuss, bitnet, lnf, logins, etc) -> moves in with rtfm.
www -> old rtfm (ds5000.25)
(only the last two lines have been changed from Matt's proposal)
IMHO, putting the web and rtfm on the same machine would be icky.
they're both high on the same things -- memory, network, you all
probably know this better than i do, if you care. if an SS20 can handle
the web and rtfm, it can handle the web and charon services (especially
given that a DEC3100 is, well, sort of handling all that right now :-)
maybe they'll come up with something different, but i doubt it. go on,
though, surprise me. :-)
jessie
(oh, and that was a suggestion as well as a prediction...)
