[1196] in SIPB-AFS-requests
Re: project.periodic-pstgs
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Jonathan I. Kamens)
Mon Dec 6 11:12:41 1993
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 1993 11:12:30 -0500
From: "Jonathan I. Kamens" <jik@security.ov.com>
To: mhpower@MIT.EDU
Cc: pshuang@MIT.EDU, sipb-afsreq@MIT.EDU
In-Reply-To: <9312060337.AA29348@snorkelwacker.MIT.EDU> (mhpower@MIT.EDU)
From: mhpower@MIT.EDU
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 93 22:37:07 EST
Seriously, though, although we might want to move around some volumes
especially if there are IAP projects that'll need lots of space, 44 Mb
free hardly qualifies as an emergency situation...
Perhaps it isn't an emergency, but it seems silly to let two
partitions stay at 94% and 95% full when we could do a significant
amount of balancing to even out the load.
I've been using the "balance" program that someone from CMU announced
to the net to do balancing in our cell. If no one objects, I see no
reason not to run it on the sipb cell to balance out the partitions
there too. Any objections?
jik
