[723] in Pthreads mailing list archive

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Web Site Proposal

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott Dybiec)
Wed Oct 1 10:00:26 1997

Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 04:02:47 -0400
From: Scott Dybiec <sdybiec@humanfactor.com>
To: monty@analytikerna.se, pthreads@MIT.EDU

Michael Widenius wrote:

> >>>>> "Scott" == Scott Dybiec <sdybiec@humanfactor.com> writes:
>
> Scott> I'm considering putting up a web page dedicated to POSIX threads with an
> Scott> emphasis on MIT Pthreads.  I have found at least three versions of MIT
> Scott> Pthreads out there each with various patch levels. I would like to see a
> Scott> single place to an "officially patched" version. Other pthread libraries
> Scott> exist for Linux, and those could be there too.
>
> Scott> The catch is that I am a user of pthreads --- I program using them. I am
> Scott> not a systems level programmer, so I would need the support of the
> Scott> community of pthreads users and patchers.
>
> Scott> What do you think?
>
> The newest pthreads is probably the one distrbuted with MySQL.
> At least I have added a lot of patches from other pthread users
> and done a lot of bug fixes myself. There is also a new port
> to HPUX.
>
> You can get a copy from:
>
> http://www.tcx.se/
>
> Yours,
> Monty

Monty,

Great to hear from you, Monty. I have followed your development of MySQL and am
most impressed.

The response to my proposal to start a  web page has been well received. I'll try
to have something up for everyone to look at soon.

Anybody know what happened to Chris Provernzano? Chris, if your out there, would
you have a problem with another site maintaining and distributing MIT pthreads?

Monty, your idea to use your version of MIT pthreads as the base is excellent. If
we did that could you help me to learn what all has happened to the release since
1.6beta6? What's this about new support for HPUX? I downloaded the 3.20.30b
version this weekend, but I didn't see much new. Is it maybe in your 3.21.9
release?

How would everyone feel about the patched release being called version 1.7?

$cott



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post