[325] in linux-security and linux-alert archive
Re: Ghostscript problem
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_K=F6nig?=)
Wed Aug 23 11:02:56 1995
To: okir@monad.swb.de (Olaf Kirch)
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 1995 15:27:32 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: linux-security@tarsier.cv.nrao.edu
In-Reply-To: <m0skz04-00005AC@monad.swb.de> from "Olaf Kirch" at Aug 22, 95 09:28:40 pm
From: Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Thomas_K=F6nig?=)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Olaf Kirch wrote:
>I'd
>suggest you also check your ps printer filter if you print postscript
>files using gs, and xdvi if you use a version that uses ghostscript to
>display postscript \special's. I checked only xdvi-20, and it's safe.
The xdvi version I use, which identifies itself as 'xdvik version 18b',
is definitely unsafe.
What other programs are there which invoke gs transparently?
- --
Thomas Koenig, Thomas.Koenig@ciw.uni-karlsruhe.de, ig25@dkauni2.bitnet.
The joy of engineering is to find a straight line on a double
logarithmic diagram.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2i
iQCVAwUBMDssufBu+cbJcKCVAQH3/QP/Y7Rne36DwYXcD00pSRZAr4p8/NSsL91K
vuz9faS0pNTTS33X5CzWs0nswz6mVDvVZu+u8LyqZlD2ecy6T4Pcqy+jwzQ6TdNf
u1d+XicYgat7c61pgVmaQ4o6FPKt/zBhIMEh7RpEOoKlQpaSF3QvqwOVCLFIfeq5
ze9tgg5rG1Q=
=iy4x
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
