[1859] in linux-security and linux-alert archive
[linux-security] Re: Services not required?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Stromberg)
Sun Jun 14 04:46:53 1998
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 1998 15:01:55 -0700
From: Dan Stromberg <strombrg@hydra.acs.uci.edu>
To: Bernhard Weisshuhn <bkw@weisshuhn.de>
CC: linux-security@redhat.com
Resent-From: linux-security@redhat.com
Resent-Reply-To: linux-security@redhat.com
Bernhard Weisshuhn wrote:
> Are there any ssl-based replacements for pop/imap in the works? Or any
> other cryptographical correct approach?
wrapssl and edssl can be used to wrap a standard IMAP or POP daemon
launched from inetd.
I tried both. I had better luck with wrapssl than edssl. wrapssl
seemed to work, but netscape's SSL imap may be flakey - netscape died on
me consistently when trying to use SSL imap - but the same (large
collection of) folders worked fine with imap but without the SSL.
This was with suns, BTW.
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please refer to the information about this list as well as general
information about Linux security at http://www.aoy.com/Linux/Security.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe linux-security-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
