[1796] in linux-security and linux-alert archive
[linux-security] Re: Re: Checking remote servers
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Quetzacoatl KukulKhan)
Thu May 28 02:43:06 1998
Date: Wed, 27 May 1998 23:05:11 +0800
From: Quetzacoatl KukulKhan <isman@ppc.psz.utm.my>
To: linux-security@redhat.com
Reply-to: isman@ppc.psz.utm.my
Resent-From: linux-security@redhat.com
ArthaXerxes wrote:
> I disagree, to an extend.
> Hacking an insecure machine is not a challenge, experimented hackers
> like difficulty. Furthermore, it is a good thing to experience on
> not sensible servers some attack scheme to reproduce them on major
> servers, that do not have the same sense of humor.
Some youngsters out there only know a little bit about network and
UNIX, then visit security site outside there, http://rootshell.com or
whatever, found some script/programs compile and simply run them.
When they found some errors in the program, their feet get numbed.
Then they simply claim themselves hacker? Do you guys agree with that
claim?
Kukulkhan
NetSecure
UTM
[mod: As we all know, there are different requirements for securing
different machines. As we all know there are different types of
crackers. So, lets cut out the "I think all crackers are xxyyzz"
discussion OK? --REW]
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Please refer to the information about this list as well as general
information about Linux security at http://www.aoy.com/Linux/Security.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe:
mail -s unsubscribe linux-security-request@redhat.com < /dev/null
