[1394] in linux-security and linux-alert archive
[linux-security] Re: Re: BoS: hmm..seen this one?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gabriel Akos)
Fri Jan 17 10:32:22 1997
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 1997 10:46:38 +0100 (MET)
From: Gabriel Akos <gabriel@rocker.sch.bme.hu>
To: linux-security@redhat.com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.ULT.3.95.970116151337.28235G-100000@manes.vse.cz>
Resent-From: linux-security@redhat.com
Reply-To: linux-security@redhat.com
On Thu, 16 Jan 1997, Hynek Med wrote:
> > Intel:
> > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/i386/util-linux-2.5-29.i386.rpm
> >
> > Alpha:
> > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/axp/util-linux-2.5-29.axp.rpm
> >
> > SPARC:
> > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.redhat.com/updates/4.0/sparc/util-linux-2.5-29.sparc.rpm
> >
> > All of these packages have been signed with Red Hat's PGP key.
>
> But when you do this, don't forget to upgrade your pam to pam-0.50-22,
> otherwise you run into problems - you won't be able to login (thank God
> ssh worked). I think util-linux should have this dependence on
> pam-0.50-22 or higher..
>
> Hynek
I have 0.50-21 and it works for me. And if not, then you could boot in
single-user mode :)
Udv:
Gabriel Akos http://www.sch.bme.hu/~gabriel
A member of the Linux Online Support Service (LOSS)
